An ‘etiquette’ section in the UK driving test would make a good start at least…

Overtaking on the inside, cutting other drivers ‘off’ and hogging the middle lane… All of these bad habits have annoyed UK motorists enough that, in a recent poll, an overwhelming majority said they would support the addition of an ‘etiquette’ section as a component in the practical driving test.

I personally couldn’t agree more - with road rage (be it someone else’s or your own) being one of the things which makes driving often so stressful and frustrating for many, it would surely be of massive benefit to educate and train drivers a little more thoroughly at the early stage of their driving lives, to help minimise this unpleasant aspect of driving.

The whole thing got me thinking about so-called ‘bad habits’ which people develop in their driving that I personally find particularly grating, most of which result from laziness or a lack of confidence. Everyone must have their own similar list, with a few changes here and there… but one things for sure; if the etiquette section can reduce the frequency of these, we’d all gladly support its inclusion. Here’s my top driving frustrations:

- People who park on double yellow lines, especially on tricky bends near busy junctions. They always significantly reduce visibility and contribute to causing accidents - and always emerge blameless every time.
- Relatives and friends who drive in third gear at 50mph (I know quite a few believe it or not), and then complain that their cars really burn through petrol at a scary rate as the engine roars and strains under the groan of motorway driving in 4th…
- Middle lane motorway hogs AND those impatient and dangerous drivers who under-take them to make a point. Basically both categories here contribute to a considerable number of motorway accidents, all because one is too lazy or not confident enough (in which case should not be on the motorway) to change lanes, while the other is too impatient and stressed that they do an even worse manoeuvre just to make a point…

Anyway, the list could go on (roundabout non-indicating, mobile phone use etc etc) - feel free to add your own pet-peeves below: I’ll finish merely by saying that such an ‘etiquette’ section would clearly be very welcome, but it also begs the question of who is making these faux-pas that around 80% of drivers find so annoying? It can surely only be these very same drivers themselves?

Dejan Levi

, , ,

Comment: Should environmental awareness be incorporated into the UK driving test?

With the average cost of learning to drive in the UK now just over £1,500, the DVLA has recorded a drop in the number of new applications for provisional licenses this year for the first time since 1999. The 8% reduction in applications (equivalent to 52,000 fewer learner drivers) also probably contributed to the DVLA reporting a considerable decrease in congestion (as did high fuel and insurance prices) on UK roads  - around 12% -  which has greatly decreased average journey times. 

But all these financial and environmental concerns have got me thinking; are new drivers in the UK really adequately informed about all relevant aspects of motoring when the pass their test? After all the learning to drive experience is for most of us our only motoring education, but beyond teaching us safety behind the wheel it hardly touches on other points of driving…

As the motoring climate undergos significant changes in the UK it might be time to consider if certain changes need to be made to the nature of testing new drivers - so as to better inform and educate them about the issues and challenges of modern motoring.

Is it time for example that an element of environmental awareness was added to the theory exam? Should learners be educated about fuel consumption and CO2 emissions and how to be aware of the levels of one’s output?

Efficient driving could be one aspect of teaching just the same as manouevres and mirror use - with students incurring a ‘minor’ for unneccesarily rapid acceleration or braking in tests, in much the same way that careless handling or neglecting to signal might be punished.

Students could be taught how to effectively budget running a car over the course of a year, and how to make decisions about driving habits based on financial and environmental information. But why stop there - learners could also be taught about different insurance types and how to negotiate the arrangements that best suit them.

There is room both to introduce the teaching of practical habits, such as a more economical and fuel-efficient style of driving, and also to discuss general theory issues relating to engine size, CO2 output and the subsequent environmental impact of driving.

In an ideal world everyone would be adequately informed and resourceful to discover this for themselves, but in reality there are far too many of us who either don’t have the time, or simply aren’t aware that such choices exist… However it is in our collective interest to support any action (such as this one) which might contribute to reducing the environmental cost of motoring in the UK and also to cutting congestion and the accidents that go with it.

It seems the current system is fairly effective at ensuring our new drivers are as safe and sensible as possible upon passing their tests, but in order to negotiate the current issues faced by motorists in the UK a few extra pieces of knowledge and information would be greatly beneficial. I can hardly imagine anyone protesting about the introduction of a few extra questions into the test that, rather than making it harder, would work only to better equip new drivers for their motoring lives.

Dejan Levi

, , ,